Once I talked to a monk regarding my question about “beings”, he answered briefly “those who depend on causes and conditions to come into being” and that was all he said. But to me that was enough, that was very clear; after long periods of searching and pondering, my concerns finally resolved. Now I understand why Zen masters used to demand that their disciples pound rice, fetch water and cut wood for many years without any semblance of teachings, until the disciple internalized a sense of maturity. Like in the old days when an apprentice wanted to learn from a master alchemist, the master would examine the disciple from every angle before proceeding to teach him skills on how to cut herbs, shed, pound and cook them… only after five to seven years would the disciple be allowed to check pulses and prescribe remedies because a minor mistake can be fatal! And when he succeeds, the master might even give him his daughter’s hand in marriage! So we can say that the context of “beings” here is not what we typically understand but refer to the causes and conditions linking up with one another and coming together, or coming into ‘being’, that is why we call them “beings”. As the chanced meeting ends, so does the act of ‘being’. In Buddhist studies we cannot rely on words alone, nor can we depart from them…

In the latter parts of the Diamond Sutra, it is said clearly that “the beings are not beings”. We are acquainted now with the “it is no…, therefore it is called…” phrasing in this sutra. This kind of saying, this unconventional, beyond-the-thinking language helps us to refute false tenets and to destroy concepts which have long been frozen in our cortex. To be liberated, a man must first free himself from his extremely solid concepts and perceptions into which, as in a spider’s web, he is entangled, caught up, hampered and unable to move.